← Comparisons

Yamaha WR-F 450 2-TRAC 2004 vs Triumph TF 450-C 2026

Yamaha

WR-F 450 2-TRAC

2004
Cross / motocross
2 criteria won
VS
Triumph

TF 450-C

2026
Cross / motocross
3 criteria won
Verdict

Triumph TF 450-C — 3/5 criteria won

Better at : PowerDisplacementSeat height
WR-F 450 2-TRAC
TF 450-C

Overall score

● Yamaha WR-F 450 2-TRAC ● Triumph TF 450-C

Tech comparison

Power ch
WR-F 450 2-TRAC 57.2 ch
TF 450-C 61.5 ch
TF 450-C ✓
Torque Nm
WR-F 450 2-TRAC 50 Nm
TF 450-C 49.9 Nm
WR-F 450 2-TRAC ✓
Displacement cc
WR-F 450 2-TRAC 449.33 cc
TF 450-C 449.5 cc
TF 450-C ✓
Top speed km/h
WR-F 450 2-TRAC 140 km/h
TF 450-C
Weight kg
WR-F 450 2-TRAC
TF 450-C 112.2 kg
Fuel capacity L
WR-F 450 2-TRAC 10 L
TF 450-C 8.3 L
WR-F 450 2-TRAC ✓
Seat height mm
WR-F 450 2-TRAC 997 mm
TF 450-C 960 mm
TF 450-C ✓

Tech comparison

Technical specificationsYamaha WR-F 450 2-TRACTriumph TF 450-C
Displacement449.33 cc449.50 cc
Power57.20 ch61.50 ch
Torque50.00 Nm49.90 Nm
Top speed140.00 km/h— km/h
Weight— kg112.20 kg
Dry weight126.00 kg— kg
Seat height997.00 mm960.00 mm
Fuel capacity10.00 L8.30 L
Engine typeMonocylindre, 4 tempsMonocylindre, 4 temps
Coolingliquideliquide
Gearboxboîte à 5 rapportsboîte à 5 rapports
Final driveChaîneChaîne
Front brakesFreinage 1 disque Ø 250 mm, étrier 2 pistonsFreinage 1 disque en pétale Ø 260 mm, étrier 2 pistons
Rear brakesFreinage 1 disque Ø 245 mm, étrier simple pistonFreinage 1 disque en pétale Brembo Ø 220 mm, étrier simple piston
Front tyre90/90-2180/100-21
Rear tyre130/90-18110/100-18

compare.datasheets

Reviews & comments

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion!