Verdict
Vuka RM 200 — 2/3 criteria won
Better at : DisplacementWheelbase
Overall score
● Vuka RM 200 ● Modenas Pulsar NS 160
Tech comparison
Power ch
Torque Nm
Pulsar NS 160 ✓
Displacement cc
RM 200 ✓
Weight kg
Fuel capacity L
Wheelbase mm
RM 200 ✓
Tech comparison
| Technical specifications | Vuka RM 200 | Modenas Pulsar NS 160 |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement | 198.00 cc | 160.30 cc |
| Power | 14.50 ch | — ch |
| Torque | 13.00 Nm | 14.00 Nm |
| Weight | — kg | 151.00 kg |
| Dry weight | 115.00 kg | — kg |
| Wheelbase | 1295.00 mm | 1370.00 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — L | 12.00 L |
| Engine type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Cooling | Air | — |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Final drive | Chain (final drive) | Chain (final drive) |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Front tyre | 2.75-17 | 90/90-17 |
| Rear tyre | 110/80-17 | 120/80-17 |
Reviews & comments
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion!