← Comparisons

Vuka RM 200 2010 vs Hercules 314 1952

Vuka

RM 200

2010
Sport
2 criteria won
VS
Hercules

314

1952
Sport
0 criteria won
Verdict

Vuka RM 200 — 2/2 criteria won

Better at : PowerDisplacement
RM 200
314

Tech comparison

Power ch
RM 200 14.5 ch
314 8.5 ch
RM 200 ✓
Torque Nm
RM 200 13 Nm
314
Displacement cc
RM 200 198 cc
314 174 cc
RM 200 ✓
Top speed km/h
RM 200
314 85 km/h
Fuel capacity L
RM 200
314 13 L
Wheelbase mm
RM 200 1295 mm
314

Tech comparison

Technical specificationsVuka RM 200Hercules 314
Displacement198.00 cc174.00 cc
Power14.50 ch8.50 ch
Torque13.00 Nm— Nm
Top speed— km/h85.00 km/h
Dry weight115.00 kg118.00 kg
Wheelbase1295.00 mm— mm
Fuel capacity— L13.00 L
Engine typeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
CoolingAirAir
Gearbox5-speed
Final driveChain   (final drive)Chain   (final drive)
Front brakesSingle discExpanding brake (drum brake)
Rear brakesExpanding brake (drum brake)Expanding brake (drum brake)
Front tyre2.75-17 3-19
Rear tyre110/80-17 3-19

compare.datasheets

Reviews & comments

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion!