← Comparisons

Harley-Davidson Dyna Fat Bob 2017 vs Triumph Thunderbird 1600 2015

Harley-Davidson

Dyna Fat Bob

2017
Custom / cruiser
2 criteria won
VS
Triumph

Thunderbird 1600

2015
Custom / cruiser
5 criteria won
Verdict

Triumph Thunderbird 1600 — 5/7 criteria won

Better at : PowerTorqueTop speedFuel capacitySeat height
Dyna Fat Bob
Thunderbird 1600

Overall score

● Harley-Davidson Dyna Fat Bob ● Triumph Thunderbird 1600

Tech comparison

Power ch
Dyna Fat Bob 80 ch
Thunderbird 1600 84.8 ch
Thunderbird 1600 ✓
Torque Nm
Dyna Fat Bob 130 Nm
Thunderbird 1600 145.1 Nm
Thunderbird 1600 ✓
Displacement cc
Dyna Fat Bob 1690 cc
Thunderbird 1600 1594 cc
Dyna Fat Bob ✓
Top speed km/h
Dyna Fat Bob 170 km/h
Thunderbird 1600 200 km/h
Thunderbird 1600 ✓
Weight kg
Dyna Fat Bob 320 kg
Thunderbird 1600 339 kg
Dyna Fat Bob ✓
Fuel capacity L
Dyna Fat Bob 18.93 L
Thunderbird 1600 22 L
Thunderbird 1600 ✓
Seat height mm
Dyna Fat Bob 705 mm
Thunderbird 1600 700 mm
Thunderbird 1600 ✓
Wheelbase mm
Dyna Fat Bob 1621 mm
Thunderbird 1600

Tech comparison

Technical specificationsHarley-Davidson Dyna Fat BobTriumph Thunderbird 1600
Displacement1690.00 cc1594.00 cc
Power80.00 ch84.80 ch
Torque130.00 Nm145.10 Nm
Top speed170.00 km/h200.00 km/h
Weight320.00 kg339.00 kg
Dry weight307.00 kg308.00 kg
Seat height705.00 mm700.00 mm
Wheelbase1621.00 mm— mm
Fuel capacity18.93 L22.00 L
Engine typeV2, four-strokeBicylindre en ligne, 4 temps
CoolingAirliquide
Gearbox6-speedboîte à 6 rapports
Final driveBelt   (final drive)Courroie
Front brakesDouble disc. 4-piston fixed. Optional ABS.Freinage 2 disques Ø 310 mm, étrier 4 pistons
Rear brakesSingle disc. 2-piston torque-free floating. Optional ABS.Freinage 1 disque Ø 310 mm, étrier 2 pistons
Front tyre130/90-B16 120/70-19
Rear tyre180/70-B16 200/50-17

compare.datasheets

Reviews & comments

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion!