← Comparisons

Beta ALP 240 1991 vs Macbor XR3 250 Montana 2026

Beta

ALP 240

1991
Enduro / offroad
0 criteria won
VS
Macbor

XR3 250 Montana

2026
Enduro / offroad
4 criteria won
Verdict

Macbor XR3 250 Montana — 4/4 criteria won

Better at : PowerDisplacementTop speedFuel capacity
ALP 240
XR3 250 Montana

Overall score

● Beta ALP 240 ● Macbor XR3 250 Montana

Tech comparison

Power ch
ALP 240 12 ch
XR3 250 Montana 25.6 ch
XR3 250 Montana ✓
Torque Nm
ALP 240
XR3 250 Montana 20.6 Nm
Displacement cc
ALP 240 239 cc
XR3 250 Montana 249.2 cc
XR3 250 Montana ✓
Top speed km/h
ALP 240 85 km/h
XR3 250 Montana 150 km/h
XR3 250 Montana ✓
Weight kg
ALP 240 86 kg
XR3 250 Montana
Fuel capacity L
ALP 240 5.5 L
XR3 250 Montana 14.5 L
XR3 250 Montana ✓

Tech comparison

Technical specificationsBeta ALP 240Macbor XR3 250 Montana
Displacement239.00 cc249.20 cc
Power12.00 ch25.60 ch
Torque— Nm20.60 Nm
Top speed85.00 km/h150.00 km/h
Weight86.00 kg— kg
Dry weight— kg170.00 kg
Fuel capacity5.50 L14.50 L
Engine typeSingle cylinder, two-strokeMonocylindre, 4 temps
CoolingAirliquide
Gearbox6-speedboîte à 6 rapports
Final driveChain   (final drive)Chaîne
Front brakesSingle discFreinage
Rear brakesSingle discFreinage 1 disque
Front tyre2.75-21
Rear tyre4.00-18

compare.datasheets

Reviews & comments

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion!